Friday, July 31, 2009

Cash For Clunkers Dead After One Week??: and they want to run my healthcare??

'Cash for Clunkers' Suspended? Funds Already Running Out

The U.S. government's wildly popular "Cash for Clunkers" program was designed to help the struggling auto industry by giving owners of old cars money toward the purchase of a new, more fuel-efficient vehicle. But now the program appears to be running out of gas. It looks as if the money to buy up used cars has already been used up.

A perfect example of this administration's incompetence in handling money. This is what happens when you spread the wealth.
Reportedly, one Billion dollars of hard earned tax payer money was set aside for the clunker program and in just one week, 93 million of it has been redistributed. That means that in a little over 10 weeks, the money will be gone! Poof!

The federal government failed to think this program through. As usual, it will be far more expensive than they thought it would be.
Meanwhile I see how much the car industry has spent in advertisements citing this program in order to get people out to the lots. The advertising campaign is still in full swing, even though what they are advertising is no longer being honored by the government. I don't know the amount that all of the combined car dealers and the rest of the auto industry has spent marketing this program, but it now looks like money wasted. My guess is the amount is substantial. Not to mention the cost that the industry has already spent in order to implement the program. They are not allowed to resell the clunkers. They have to destroy the engines and drive trains, and otherwise prepare them for disposal.

Can you imagine what will happen if Obamacare passes both the House and Senate? They can't even run this clunker program, imagine them in charge of your well being!!

As usual, the federal government has shown itself incompetent and short sighted. They can't do anything right. They need to go back to doing what they were meant to do: ensure our liberty and freedom and defend this nation from foriegn aggressors. They have utterly failed at everything else they have ever touched.

Don't touch our healthcare unless you can prove you are highly competent. We will settle for nothing less.

Thursday, July 30, 2009

I am So Sick of Progressives Calling All of Their Enemies Racist

It never fails.
You enter into an honest debate about politics and the left instantly labels you a racist or a sexist. They can't beat you on the field of ideas, so instead of presenting a logical, well thought out argument to counter yours, they drop the "R" bomb, or the "S" bomb.
And it doesn't matter what race or sex you happen to be.

And the truth is, that the progressive elites are the most racist, sexist, discriminatory lot on earth.

Look how they attacked Sarah Palin for instance.
They focussed on ridiculing her clothing purchases, something that treats her differently than a male candidate. That is also focusing on appearance rather than substance. During the Presidential Campaign Palin was attacked for her expensive wardrobe yet Michelle Obama was praised for hers. They also attacked, and continue to attack her through her children.

Look how they treat Michelle Malkin, a Filipino woman who writes with a conservative slant. An example of the hateful emails she has gotten?:

-- "Say, how does it feel to be a paid prostitute for the republicans? Go get some more collagen injected in your lips, it makes you look more the part."

-- "michelle how does it feel to whore yourself for the republican party .it must be tough to look yourself in the mirror."

-- "You are a vile, disgusting tramp that has sold her sole to the white dogs (not all whites are dogs though) and cast your lot with the House Niggers."

-- "How much does the GOP pay you to be their propaganda whore?"

And does anyone remember those cartoons of Condeleeza Rice over the last few years?

Barbara Boxer trotted out the NAACP to oppose the National Black Chamber of Commerce opposition to Cap & Trade. It was her way of saying, "The rest of my black children think like me. What happened to you?"

Do you see how progressive elitists operate? They see themselves as compassionate, but they expect their intellectual slaves to remain on the plantation they have made for them. It's as if they think their so called civil rights credentials permit them to own the souls of all minority groups. As a result, they only like the "good" minorities who stay in their place. Observe how Senator Boxer trots out what she considers "good" slaves who know their place in order to oppose the National Black Chamber of Commerce uppity opposition to Cap and Trade. He wanted to discuss the facts according to extensive research, and she wanted to bring him back on the diversity plantation. Those who dare escape the elite progressive's plantation find themselves the target of a "high tech lynching" reserved for minorities who get "uppity." Ask Justice Clarence Thomas.

And they expect everyone on their plantation to go along with their tactics, or suffer the same.

Lloyd Marcus, the songwriter that wrote the "American Tea Party Anthem" wrote the following:

”Maybe this ##### should shut up and learn his place” is one of numerous racist hate-filled comments posted on YouTube attacking me, a black Conservative, for writing the “American Tea Party Anthem.” And who is spewing this racist hate? So-called tolerant Liberals.
But how can this be? According to the biased media, liberal democrats are saviors saintly protecting blacks from evil rich white conservative republicans. Regretfully, their “devoid of the truth” marketing plan has been extremely successful. For generations, like zombies, blacks award liberal democrats 90% of their vote.

Liberal democrats HATE ‘uppity’ blacks who achieve
Like the woman in the old diet infomercial, I want to scream to my fellow blacks, “STOP THE INSANITY! Liberals democrats are NOT OUR FRIENDS!” They want to keep us on their “you’re a victim” plantation. Simply put, Liberal democrats HATE ‘uppity’ blacks who achieve without their programs such as Affirmative Action.

Here are my outrageously stupid beliefs which have caused libs to call me the “N” word on numerous occasions. I love my country. I tell youths all limits are self-imposed. No one is entitled to the fruits of someone else’s labors. I refuse to see myself as a victim.

Liberal actress, Janeane Garofalo, diagnose blacks who think like me as suffering from “Stockholm Syndrome.” Garofalo in her arrogance is REALLY saying,"Get your black ‘A’ back on the plantation. Who do you think you are? You are NOT free. You are a eternal victim. Every white American will ALWAYS owe you! GOT IT, you dumb, “N"?"

Yeah, how true it is.

Shocking Hypocrisy Audio found Obama didnt like it when Bush Rushed Through Legislation

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Ironic Relatives: Professor Gates and Sgt. Crowley

It looks like the President is going to be drinking beer with two irishmen at the whitehouse. That's right. Professor Gates is half irish, and the irony in all of this is that he and Sgt Crowley are both descended from the same famous irishman. They both hail from the O'neil clan. The story from Irish Central.

Professor Gates should research the history of the irish slaves he was descended from. I wonder if he knows anything about the fact that irish women were captured in ireland and shipped to the US and the West Indies as slaves and were often used for the purpose of being bred by african slaves in order to create a lighter skinned slave. They were also considered more valuable monetarily than the irish slaves. The children were always considered descendants of their fathers, thus legally african slaves, even though their mothers were white. Many blacks even today inist that a child with any amount of black blood at all is black. In other words, they are giving creditability to the plantation owners.
I wonder if he knows that his irish ancestors were sold for 5 pence, while his more "valuable" african forebearers were sold for 50 pence. This created a world were it was ok to beat an irish slave to death, but not smart financially to do so to an african slave.
I wonder if he has ever come across universty courses similar to this one:

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

The Progressives never Tell the Truth: just what ya wanna hear

I don't mind an honest debate. I think ideas should be debated. Everyone does not agree with me obviously, and I respect that.

What I do NOT respect is a dishonest debate and hidden agendas. That is the modus operandi of the progressives throughout history. Both Republican and Democrat.

I'm pretty straightforward when I tell you I am for liberty and freedom. No hidden agenda. No subversive secret path to fulfill my goals. The progressives are not like that, because they know that if they admitted to their aims, they would lose the debate immediately. Thus they use the tools of incrementalism to slowly take over the US. They don't appeal to your reason and logic, but tug at your heartstrings in order to win small victories time and time again. They will use your emotions against you in order to chip away at your liberty.

Friday, July 24, 2009

Health Care is a Right.

I have been hearing a lot of clamour from the progressives out there proclaiming that healthcare is a "right".

Ok, I'll go along with that. It's not specifically in the bill of rights, but we can all probably agree that it is a fundemental human right.

The rights laid out in the Constitution describe what the US Government may not impose upon us.
For Example:

1st Ammendment- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

2nd Amendment - A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

3rd Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

4th Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Etc, etc,.

Since our Constitutional rights tell us what the Government cannot do to us, then it probably should not be allowed to impose any laws that regulate how we and our doctors interact with each other. Any law that suggests otherwise is an infringement on our freedom.

If you want to define "rights" as what government ought to regulate and provide FOR us, then I would like to know why the Government is not providing us with arms. Why is it not giving us free internet and a government paid platform for us to issue forth our free speech? Why is there not a guard or two posted at my door to make sure no one attempts to search my property without a warrant?

So lets call health care a right. I'm cool with that. I can't afford it, but I can't afford a really really nice gun either.